The study aimed at studying the efficacy of a computerized training program for teaching reading skills via both total communication and oral method for kindergarten children with hearing impairment. The study sample consisted of 60 children randomly allocated into four groups as follows: 1. Experimental Group (1) consisted of 14 children studied using the computerized total communication method. 2. Control Group (1*) consisted of 16 children studied using conventional method. 3. Experimental Group (2) consisted of 14 children studied using the computerized oral method. 4. Control Group (2*) consisted of 16 children studied using conventional method. The study instrument consisted of three dimensions: the first dimension consists of eighty four items (Arabic language letters with short vowel extension). The second dimension consists of eighty four items (Arabic language letters with long vowel extension). The third dimension consists of eighty four items (Arabic language letters at the beginning, middle and end of the word). Proper reliability and validity coefficients were computed for this instrument. The program was applied through 90 sessions in 4.5 months. The results of the study have shown that experimental group (1) that studied using the computerized total communication method was better in terms of learning reading compared to the control group (1*) that studied using the conventional method. In addition, the results have shown that experimental group (2) that studied using the computerized oral method was better in learning reading that the control group (2*) which studied using the conventional method. Furthermore, the results show that the computerized total communication method was better in learning reading among students with hearing impairment compared to the computerized oral method. There were no significant differences in learning reading due to gender. The overall result has shown that there is an interaction between the experimental groups (1 and 2) with the computerized program compared to the control groups (1* and 2*) favoring the experimental groups. This indicates the efficacy of the computerized program in both total communication method and the oral method.